Chemical fact sheet: Dicaffeoylquinic acid isomer

Dicaffeoylquinic acid isomer

Basics

Category
Hydroxycinnamic & hydroxybenzoic acid derivatives & other organic acid derivatives
IUPAC-name
3,5-bis(((E)-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)acryloyl)oxy)-1,4-dihydroxycyclohexane-1-carboxylic acid
Formula
No formula stored
Exact mass
516.12680 g/mol
Molecular weight
No weights stored
Structure
Chemical structure of dicaffeoylquinic acid isomer
Figure 1.1: Chemical structure of dicaffeoylquinic acid isomer

Sources

In summary, the chemical dicaffeoylquinic acid isomer has been analyzed from following sources:

Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

Note that an analysis result in the database may indicate either presence or lack thereof of a chemical in an analyzed sample.

References

  1. G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

Analysis results

Analysis result 1

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 515.11768 m/z
MS²⁻ 173
179
191
299
335
353 		m/z
MS³⁻ 135
155
173
179
191 		m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
UHPLC
Mass spectrometer description
UHPLC-MS, HRMS, LTQ OrbiTrap, UHPLC–LTQ OrbiTrap MS/MS, HESI, heated ESI
Organism
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
wild
ground, dried
Sample note
The samples were collected in Turkey (Taskopru, Karacaoglu village). Taxonomic spotting was performed at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, voucher number: MARE-19056./ Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) was performed at 600W microwave power.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
50 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
30 min
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Detection note
MS2 fragments (% base peak): 353 (100), 335 (20), 299 (5), 191 (5), 179 (15), 173 (20); MS3: 191 (45), 179 (70), 173 (100), 155 (5), 135 8(0); MS4: 155 (20), 111 (50), 93 (100), 71 (75)
References

G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

Analysis result 2

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 515.11760 m/z
MS²⁻ 179
191
335
353 		m/z
MS³⁻ 135
179
191 		m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
UHPLC
Mass spectrometer description
UHPLC-MS, HRMS, LTQ OrbiTrap, UHPLC–LTQ OrbiTrap MS/MS, HESI, heated ESI
Organism
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
wild
ground, dried
Sample note
The samples were collected in Turkey (Taskopru, Karacaoglu village). Taxonomic spotting was performed at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, voucher number: MARE-19056./ Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) was performed at 600W microwave power.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
50 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
30 min
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Detection note
MS2 fragments (% base peak): 353 (100), 335 (5), 191 (10), 179 (5); MS3: 191 (100), 179 (30), 135 (10); MS4: 173 (70), 127 (100), 111 (40), 93 (55), 85 (90)
References

G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

Analysis result 3

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 515.11721 m/z
MS²⁻ 173
179
191
299
335
353 		m/z
MS³⁻ 135
155
173
179
191 		m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
UHPLC
Mass spectrometer description
UHPLC-MS, HRMS, LTQ OrbiTrap, UHPLC–LTQ OrbiTrap MS/MS, HESI, heated ESI
Organism
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
wild
ground, dried
Sample note
The samples were collected in Turkey (Taskopru, Karacaoglu village). Taxonomic spotting was performed at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, voucher number: MARE-19056./ Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) was performed at 600W microwave power.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
50 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
30 min
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Detection note
MS2 fragments (% base peak): 353 (100), 335 (5), 299 (10), 191 (5), 179 (10), 173 (10); MS3: 191 (45), 179 (70), 173 (100), 155 (5), 135 (10); MS4: 155 (20), 111 (50), 93 (100), 71 (75)
References

G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

Analysis result 4

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 515.11698 m/z
MS²⁻ 173
179
191
299
335
353 		m/z
MS³⁻ 135
155
173
179
191 		m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
UHPLC
Mass spectrometer description
UHPLC-MS, HRMS, LTQ OrbiTrap, UHPLC–LTQ OrbiTrap MS/MS, HESI, heated ESI
Organism
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
wild
ground, dried
Sample note
The samples were collected in Turkey (Taskopru, Karacaoglu village). Taxonomic spotting was performed at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, voucher number: MARE-19056./ Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) was performed at 600W microwave power.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
50 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
30 min
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Detection note
MS2 fragments (% base peak): 353 (100), 335 (5), 299 (5), 191 (5), 179 (5), 173 (5); MS3: 191 (100), 179 (80), 173 (95), 155 (5), 135 (20); MS4: 173 (70), 127 (100), 111 (40), 98 (55), 85 (90)
References

G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

Analysis result 5

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 515.11768 m/z
MS²⁻ 173
179
191
299
335
353 		m/z
MS³⁻ 135
155
173
179
191 		m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
UHPLC
Mass spectrometer description
UHPLC-MS, HRMS, LTQ OrbiTrap, UHPLC–LTQ OrbiTrap MS/MS, HESI, heated ESI
Organism
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
wild
ground, dried
Sample note
The samples were collected in Turkey (Taskopru, Karacaoglu village). Taxonomic spotting was performed at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, voucher number: MARE-19056./Sonication of plant-ethanol mixture was done in ultrasonic bath for an hour at 30 °C.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
40 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
1 h
Extraction temperature
30 °C
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Detection note
MS2 fragments (% base peak): 353 (100), 335 (20), 299 (5), 191 (5), 179 (15), 173 (20); MS3: 191 (45), 179 (70), 173 (100), 155 (5), 135 8(0); MS4: 155 (20), 111 (50), 93 (100), 71 (75)
References

G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

Analysis result 6

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 515.11760 m/z
MS²⁻ 179
191
335
353 		m/z
MS³⁻ 135
179
191 		m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
UHPLC
Mass spectrometer description
UHPLC-MS, HRMS, LTQ OrbiTrap, UHPLC–LTQ OrbiTrap MS/MS, HESI, heated ESI
Organism
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
wild
ground, dried
Sample note
The samples were collected in Turkey (Taskopru, Karacaoglu village). Taxonomic spotting was performed at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, voucher number: MARE-19056./Sonication of plant-ethanol mixture was done in ultrasonic bath for an hour at 30 °C.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
40 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
1 h
Extraction temperature
30 °C
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Detection note
MS2 fragments (% base peak): 353 (100), 335 (5), 191 (10), 179 (5); MS3: 191 (100), 179 (30), 135 (10); MS4: 173 (70), 127 (100), 111 (40), 93 (55), 85 (90)
References

G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

Analysis result 7

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 515.11721 m/z
MS²⁻ 173
179
191
299
335
353 		m/z
MS³⁻ 135
155
173
179
191 		m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
UHPLC
Mass spectrometer description
UHPLC-MS, HRMS, LTQ OrbiTrap, UHPLC–LTQ OrbiTrap MS/MS, HESI, heated ESI
Organism
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
wild
ground, dried
Sample note
The samples were collected in Turkey (Taskopru, Karacaoglu village). Taxonomic spotting was performed at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, voucher number: MARE-19056./Sonication of plant-ethanol mixture was done in ultrasonic bath for an hour at 30 °C.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
40 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
1 h
Extraction temperature
30 °C
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Detection note
MS2 fragments (% base peak): 353 (100), 335 (5), 299 (10), 191 (5), 179 (10), 173 (10); MS3: 191 (45), 179 (70), 173 (100), 155 (5), 135 (10); MS4: 155 (20), 111 (50), 93 (100), 71 (75)
References

G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

Analysis result 8

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 515.11698 m/z
MS²⁻ 173
179
191
299
335
353 		m/z
MS³⁻ 135
155
173
179
191 		m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
UHPLC
Mass spectrometer description
UHPLC-MS, HRMS, LTQ OrbiTrap, UHPLC–LTQ OrbiTrap MS/MS, HESI, heated ESI
Organism
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
wild
ground, dried
Sample note
The samples were collected in Turkey (Taskopru, Karacaoglu village). Taxonomic spotting was performed at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, voucher number: MARE-19056./Sonication of plant-ethanol mixture was done in ultrasonic bath for an hour at 30 °C.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
40 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
1 h
Extraction temperature
30 °C
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Detection note
MS2 fragments (% base peak): 353 (100), 335 (5), 299 (5), 191 (5), 179 (5), 173 (5); MS3: 191 (100), 179 (80), 173 (95), 155 (5), 135 (20); MS4: 173 (70), 127 (100), 111 (40), 98 (55), 85 (90)
References

G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

Analysis result 9

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 515.11768 m/z
MS²⁻ 173
179
191
299
335
353 		m/z
MS³⁻ 135
155
173
179
191 		m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
UHPLC
Mass spectrometer description
UHPLC-MS, HRMS, LTQ OrbiTrap, UHPLC–LTQ OrbiTrap MS/MS, HESI, heated ESI
Organism
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
wild
ground, dried
Sample note
The samples were collected in Turkey (Taskopru, Karacaoglu village). Taxonomic spotting was performed at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, voucher number: MARE-19056./The plant samples were macerated at room temperature at dark for 24 h.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
50 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
1 d
Extraction temperature
20±5 °C
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Detection note
MS2 fragments (% base peak): 353 (100), 335 (20), 299 (5), 191 (5), 179 (15), 173 (20); MS3: 191 (45), 179 (70), 173 (100), 155 (5), 135 8(0); MS4: 155 (20), 111 (50), 93 (100), 71 (75)
References

G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

Analysis result 10

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 515.11760 m/z
MS²⁻ 179
191
335
353 		m/z
MS³⁻ 135
179
191 		m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
UHPLC
Mass spectrometer description
UHPLC-MS, HRMS, LTQ OrbiTrap, UHPLC–LTQ OrbiTrap MS/MS, HESI, heated ESI
Organism
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
wild
ground, dried
Sample note
The samples were collected in Turkey (Taskopru, Karacaoglu village). Taxonomic spotting was performed at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, voucher number: MARE-19056./The plant samples were macerated at room temperature at dark for 24 h.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
50 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
1 d
Extraction temperature
20±5 °C
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Detection note
MS2 fragments (% base peak): 353 (100), 335 (5), 191 (10), 179 (5); MS3: 191 (100), 179 (30), 135 (10); MS4: 173 (70), 127 (100), 111 (40), 93 (55), 85 (90)
References

G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

Analysis result 11

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 515.11721 m/z
MS²⁻ 173
179
191
299
335
353 		m/z
MS³⁻ 135
155
173
179
191 		m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
UHPLC
Mass spectrometer description
UHPLC-MS, HRMS, LTQ OrbiTrap, UHPLC–LTQ OrbiTrap MS/MS, HESI, heated ESI
Organism
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
wild
ground, dried
Sample note
The samples were collected in Turkey (Taskopru, Karacaoglu village). Taxonomic spotting was performed at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, voucher number: MARE-19056./The plant samples were macerated at room temperature at dark for 24 h.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
50 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
1 d
Extraction temperature
20±5 °C
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Detection note
MS2 fragments (% base peak): 353 (100), 335 (5), 299 (10), 191 (5), 179 (10), 173 (10); MS3: 191 (45), 179 (70), 173 (100), 155 (5), 135 (10); MS4: 155 (20), 111 (50), 93 (100), 71 (75)
References

G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

Analysis result 12

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 515.11698 m/z
MS²⁻ 173
179
191
299
335
353 		m/z
MS³⁻ 135
155
173
179
191 		m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
UHPLC
Mass spectrometer description
UHPLC-MS, HRMS, LTQ OrbiTrap, UHPLC–LTQ OrbiTrap MS/MS, HESI, heated ESI
Organism
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
wild
ground, dried
Sample note
The samples were collected in Turkey (Taskopru, Karacaoglu village). Taxonomic spotting was performed at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, voucher number: MARE-19056./The plant samples were macerated at room temperature at dark for 24 h.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
50 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
1 d
Extraction temperature
20±5 °C
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Detection note
MS2 fragments (% base peak): 353 (100), 335 (5), 299 (5), 191 (5), 179 (5), 173 (5); MS3: 191 (100), 179 (80), 173 (95), 155 (5), 135 (20); MS4: 173 (70), 127 (100), 111 (40), 98 (55), 85 (90)
References

G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .