Chemical fact sheet: 6-methoxy-luteolin

6-methoxy-luteolin

Basics

Category
Flavone and flavonol derivatives
IUPAC-name
2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-6-methoxy-4H-chromen-4-one
Formula
No formula stored
Exact mass
316.05830 g/mol
Molecular weight
No weights stored
Structure
Chemical structure of 6-methoxy-luteolin
Figure 1.1: Chemical structure of 6-methoxy-luteolin

Sources

In summary, the chemical 6-methoxy-luteolin has been analyzed from following sources:

Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
1st 2nd 3rd

Note that an analysis result in the database may indicate either presence or lack thereof of a chemical in an analyzed sample.

References

  1. G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

Analysis results

Analysis result 1

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 315.05035 m/z
MS²⁻ 166
300
301 		m/z
MS³⁻ 216
227
243
255
272
283 		m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
UHPLC
Mass spectrometer description
UHPLC-MS, HRMS, LTQ OrbiTrap, UHPLC–LTQ OrbiTrap MS/MS, HESI, heated ESI
Organism
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
wild
ground, dried
Sample note
The samples were collected in Turkey (Taskopru, Karacaoglu village). Taxonomic spotting was performed at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, voucher number: MARE-19056./ Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) was performed at 600W microwave power.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
50 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
30 min
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Detection note
MS2 fragments (% base peak): 301 (20), 300 (100), 166 (5); MS3: 283 (35), 272 (45), 255 (45), 243 (40), 227 (80), 216 (100); MS4: 201 (20), 188 (100), 173 (10), 132 (10)
References

G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

Analysis result 2

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 315.05035 m/z
MS²⁻ 166
300
301 		m/z
MS³⁻ 216
227
243
255
272
283 		m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
UHPLC
Mass spectrometer description
UHPLC-MS, HRMS, LTQ OrbiTrap, UHPLC–LTQ OrbiTrap MS/MS, HESI, heated ESI
Organism
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
wild
ground, dried
Sample note
The samples were collected in Turkey (Taskopru, Karacaoglu village). Taxonomic spotting was performed at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, voucher number: MARE-19056./Sonication of plant-ethanol mixture was done in ultrasonic bath for an hour at 30 °C.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
40 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
1 h
Extraction temperature
30 °C
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Detection note
MS2 fragments (% base peak): 301 (20), 300 (100), 166 (5); MS3: 283 (35), 272 (45), 255 (45), 243 (40), 227 (80), 216 (100); MS4: 201 (20), 188 (100), 173 (10), 132 (10)
References

G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

Analysis result 3

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 315.05035 m/z
MS²⁻ 166
300
301 		m/z
MS³⁻ 216
227
243
255
272
283 		m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
UHPLC
Mass spectrometer description
UHPLC-MS, HRMS, LTQ OrbiTrap, UHPLC–LTQ OrbiTrap MS/MS, HESI, heated ESI
Organism
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
wild
ground, dried
Sample note
The samples were collected in Turkey (Taskopru, Karacaoglu village). Taxonomic spotting was performed at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, voucher number: MARE-19056./The plant samples were macerated at room temperature at dark for 24 h.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
50 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
1 d
Extraction temperature
20±5 °C
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Detection note
MS2 fragments (% base peak): 301 (20), 300 (100), 166 (5); MS3: 283 (35), 272 (45), 255 (45), 243 (40), 227 (80), 216 (100); MS4: 201 (20), 188 (100), 173 (10), 132 (10)
References

G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .