Chemical fact sheet: Dihydroxybenzoic acid hexoside

Dihydroxybenzoic acid hexoside

Basics

Category
Hydroxycinnamic & hydroxybenzoic acid derivatives & other organic acid derivatives
IUPAC-name
3-hydroxy-2-((3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-2-yl)oxy)benzoic acid
Formula
No formula stored
Exact mass
316.07940 g/mol
Molecular weight
316.08060 g/mol
Structure
Chemical structure of dihydroxybenzoic acid hexoside
Figure 1.1: Chemical structure of dihydroxybenzoic acid hexoside

Sources

In summary, the chemical dihydroxybenzoic acid hexoside has been analyzed from following sources:

Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
1st 2nd 3rd
Tanacetum poteriifolium  Grierson
1st 2nd

Note that an analysis result in the database may indicate either presence or lack thereof of a chemical in an analyzed sample.

References

  1. G. Zengin, E. Sieniawska, I. Senkardes, M. Picot-Allain, K. Sinan, and M. Mahomoodally, "Antioxidant abilities, key enzyme inhibitory potential and phytochemical profile of Tanacetum poteriifolium Grierson.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 140 , pp. 111629 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111629 .
  2. G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

Analysis results

Analysis result 1

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 315.08060 m/z
MS²⁻ 109.03250
153.01980 		m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
Mass spectrometer description
LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS
Organism
Tanacetum poteriifolium  Grierson
wild
dried, powdered
Collection dates
2018
Sample note
Botanical authentication was done in Turkey, by the botanist Dr. Ismail Senkardes (Marmara University, Faculty of Pharmacy Turkey). The samples were collected in Kastamonu (Hanonu, Yukaricakircay village)
Drying methods
air-dried, dark
Drying temperature
20±5 °C
Dried material storage temperature
4 °C
Dried material storage notes
10 days
Extraction solvents
water, boiling water
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
50 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
20 min
Extraction temperature
100 °C
Extract drying method
lyophilization
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Analysis solvents
water
References

G. Zengin, E. Sieniawska, I. Senkardes, M. Picot-Allain, K. Sinan, and M. Mahomoodally, "Antioxidant abilities, key enzyme inhibitory potential and phytochemical profile of Tanacetum poteriifolium Grierson.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 140 , pp. 111629 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111629 .

Analysis result 2

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 315.08060 m/z
MS²⁻ 109.03250
153.01980 		m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
Mass spectrometer description
LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS
Organism
Tanacetum poteriifolium  Grierson
wild
dried, powdered
Collection dates
2018
Sample note
Botanical authentication was d in Turkey.one by the botanist Dr. Ismail Senkardes (Marmara University, Faculty of Pharmacy Turkey). The samples were collected in Kastamonu (Hanonu, Yukaricakircay village)
Drying methods
air-dried, dark
Drying temperature
20±5 °C
Dried material storage temperature
4 °C
Dried material storage notes
10 days
Extraction solvents
methanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
50 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
1 d
Extract drying method
evaporation in vacuo
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Analysis solvents
MeOH
References

G. Zengin, E. Sieniawska, I. Senkardes, M. Picot-Allain, K. Sinan, and M. Mahomoodally, "Antioxidant abilities, key enzyme inhibitory potential and phytochemical profile of Tanacetum poteriifolium Grierson.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 140 , pp. 111629 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111629 .

Analysis result 3

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 315.07108 m/z
MS²⁻ 108
109
152
153 		m/z
MS³⁻ 109 m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
UHPLC
Mass spectrometer description
UHPLC-MS, HRMS, LTQ OrbiTrap, UHPLC–LTQ OrbiTrap MS/MS, HESI, heated ESI
Organism
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
wild
ground, dried
Sample note
The samples were collected in Turkey (Taskopru, Karacaoglu village). Taxonomic spotting was performed at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, voucher number: MARE-19056./ Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) was performed at 600W microwave power.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
50 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
30 min
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Detection note
MS2 fragments (% base peak): 153 (100), 152 (50), 109 (15), 108 (10)
References

G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

Analysis result 4

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 315.07108 m/z
MS²⁻ 108
109
152
153 		m/z
MS³⁻ 109 m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
UHPLC
Mass spectrometer description
UHPLC-MS, HRMS, LTQ OrbiTrap, UHPLC–LTQ OrbiTrap MS/MS, HESI, heated ESI
Organism
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
wild
ground, dried
Sample note
The samples were collected in Turkey (Taskopru, Karacaoglu village). Taxonomic spotting was performed at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, voucher number: MARE-19056./Sonication of plant-ethanol mixture was done in ultrasonic bath for an hour at 30 °C.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
40 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
1 h
Extraction temperature
30 °C
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Detection note
MS2 fragments (% base peak): 153 (100), 152 (50), 109 (15), 108 (10)
References

G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

Analysis result 5

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 315.07108 m/z
MS²⁻ 108
109
152
153 		m/z
MS³⁻ 109 m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
UHPLC
Mass spectrometer description
UHPLC-MS, HRMS, LTQ OrbiTrap, UHPLC–LTQ OrbiTrap MS/MS, HESI, heated ESI
Organism
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
wild
ground, dried
Sample note
The samples were collected in Turkey (Taskopru, Karacaoglu village). Taxonomic spotting was performed at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, voucher number: MARE-19056./The plant samples were macerated at room temperature at dark for 24 h.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
50 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
1 d
Extraction temperature
20±5 °C
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Detection note
MS2 fragments (% base peak): 153 (100), 152 (50), 109 (15), 108 (10)
References

G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .