Chemical fact sheet: Patuletin

The BCDB-database is not an authoritative database. This sheet collates data stored for chemical entry patuletin and its related chemical compound entries 3,5,7,3',4'-pentahydroxy-6-methoxyflavone .

Patuletin

Basics

Category
Flavone and flavonol derivatives
IUPAC-name
2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3,5,7-trihydroxy-6-methoxy-4H-chromen-4-one
Formula
No formula stored
Exact mass
332.05322 g/mol
Molecular weight
No weights stored
Structure
Chemical structure of patuletin
Figure 1.1: Chemical structure of patuletin

Sources

In summary, the chemical patuletin has been analyzed from following sources:

Tagetes patula  L.
1st
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
1st 2nd 3rd

Note that an analysis result in the database may indicate either presence or lack thereof of a chemical in an analyzed sample.

References

  1. Ø. Andersen, and K. Markham, Flavonoids. Chemistry, biochemistry and applications.. CRC Press, 2006
  2. P. Guinot, A. Gargadennec, G. Valette, A. Fruchier, and C. Andary, "Primary flavonoids in marigold dye: extraction, structure and involvement in the dyeing process.," Phytochemical Analysis , vol. 19 , pp. 46–51 , DOI: 10.1002/pca.1014 .
  3. G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

Analysis results

Analysis result 1

Detection technique Values Units
UV/Vis 259
273 sh
338 sh
373 		nm
[M⁺ H]⁺ 333 m/z
STD
False
TLC
True
UV/Vis detector description
HPLC-PAD
Mass spectrometer description
ESI-MS, Q-Tof-1
Organism
Tagetes patula  L.
cultivated
dried, powdered
Sample note
Plant material was authenticated by Prof. Claude Andary (Laboratoire de Botanique, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montpellier.Voucher specimen was deposited in the Herbarium of the same laboratory.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol:water, 8:2
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
31.3 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
2
Extraction time
40 min
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Analysis solvents
EtOH:water, 2:8, (v/v)
References

P. Guinot, A. Gargadennec, G. Valette, A. Fruchier, and C. Andary, "Primary flavonoids in marigold dye: extraction, structure and involvement in the dyeing process.," Phytochemical Analysis , vol. 19 , pp. 46–51 , DOI: 10.1002/pca.1014 .

Analysis result 2

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 331.04462 m/z
MS²⁻ 166
181
209
316 		m/z
MS³⁻ 166
243
255
271
287 		m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
UHPLC
Mass spectrometer description
UHPLC-MS, HRMS, LTQ OrbiTrap, UHPLC–LTQ OrbiTrap MS/MS, HESI, heated ESI
Organism
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
wild
ground, dried
Sample note
The samples were collected in Turkey (Taskopru, Karacaoglu village). Taxonomic spotting was performed at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, voucher number: MARE-19056./ Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) was performed at 600W microwave power.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
50 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
30 min
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Detection note
MS2 fragments (% base peak): 316 (100), 209 (5), 181 (5), 166 (5); MS3: 287 (100), 271 (75), 255 (30), 243 (35), 166 (95); MS4: 287 (100), 243 (50), 231 (25), 215 (35), 199 (15)
References

G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

Analysis result 3

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 331.04462 m/z
MS²⁻ 166
181
209
316 		m/z
MS³⁻ 166
243
255
271
287 		m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
UHPLC
Mass spectrometer description
UHPLC-MS, HRMS, LTQ OrbiTrap, UHPLC–LTQ OrbiTrap MS/MS, HESI, heated ESI
Organism
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
wild
ground, dried
Sample note
The samples were collected in Turkey (Taskopru, Karacaoglu village). Taxonomic spotting was performed at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, voucher number: MARE-19056./Sonication of plant-ethanol mixture was done in ultrasonic bath for an hour at 30 °C.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
40 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
1 h
Extraction temperature
30 °C
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Detection note
MS2 fragments (% base peak): 316 (100), 209 (5), 181 (5), 166 (5); MS3: 287 (100), 271 (75), 255 (30), 243 (35), 166 (95); MS4: 287 (100), 243 (50), 231 (25), 215 (35), 199 (15)
References

G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

Analysis result 4

Detection technique Values Units
[M⁻ H]⁻ 331.04462 m/z
MS²⁻ 166
181
209
316 		m/z
MS³⁻ 166
243
255
271
287 		m/z
STD
False
TLC
False
UV/Vis detector description
UHPLC
Mass spectrometer description
UHPLC-MS, HRMS, LTQ OrbiTrap, UHPLC–LTQ OrbiTrap MS/MS, HESI, heated ESI
Organism
Tanacetum parthenium  (L.) Sch. Bip.
wild
ground, dried
Sample note
The samples were collected in Turkey (Taskopru, Karacaoglu village). Taxonomic spotting was performed at Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey, voucher number: MARE-19056./The plant samples were macerated at room temperature at dark for 24 h.
Drying methods
air-dried
Extraction solvents
ethanol
Extraction mass/volume-ratio
50 mg/mL
Extraction repeats
1
Extraction time
1 d
Extraction temperature
20±5 °C
Extract drying method
concentration under vacuum
Extract drying temperature
40 °C
Dried extract storage temperature
4 °C
Detection note
MS2 fragments (% base peak): 316 (100), 209 (5), 181 (5), 166 (5); MS3: 287 (100), 271 (75), 255 (30), 243 (35), 166 (95); MS4: 287 (100), 243 (50), 231 (25), 215 (35), 199 (15)
References

G. Zengin, A. Cvetanonović, U. Gašić, A. Stupar, G. Bulut, I. Şenkardes, A. Dogan, K. Sinan, Z. Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, A. Aktumsek, and M. Mahomoodally, "Modern and traditional extraction techniques affect chemical composition and bioactivity of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Sch. Bip.," Industrial Crops and Products , vol. 146 , pp. 112202 , DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112202 .

3,5,7,3',4'-pentahydroxy-6-methoxyflavone

Basics

Category
Flavone
IUPAC-name
2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3,5,7-trihydroxy-6-methoxy-4H-chromen-4-one
Formula
No formula stored
Exact mass
332.05320 g/mol
Molecular weight
No weights stored
Structure
Chemical structure of 3,5,7,3',4'-pentahydroxy-6-methoxyflavone
Figure 2.1: Chemical structure of 3,5,7,3',4'-pentahydroxy-6-methoxyflavone

Sources

No links to any potential source for this chemical in the database.

References

  1. Ø. Andersen, and K. Markham, Flavonoids. Chemistry, biochemistry and applications.. CRC Press, 2006

Analysis results

No analysis results for this entry in the database.